Buhari, Malami give reason for extending Mohammed Adamu’s stay as IGP

• As lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s removal

President Muhammadu Buhari has said the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria gives him the power to extend the tenure of Mohammed Adamu as Inspector General of Police (IGP).

It would be recalled that an Abuja-based lawyer, Maxwell Okpara had approached a Federal High Court in Abuja with a suit seeking to stop Adamu from parading himself as the IGP.

Okpara joined the president, IGP Adamu, Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami (SAN) and the Nigeria Police Council as defendants in the suit.

But, President Buhari and Malami, in a counter-affidavit filed on March 15, 2021, said, in the exercise of the executive power conferred on the president by the constitution, he can appoint a serving police officer as the IGP in consultation with the Police Council.

The counter-affidavit deposed to by a litigation clerk in the Federal Ministry of Justice, Thomas Etah said, it is a fact that extension of the tenure of any public officer is conferred on the president and Adamu is a public officer.

According to the president, the Police Council and the Police Service Commission have not disclosed any contrary fact that Adamu is not a serving police officer.

He said: “The Nigeria Police Act 2020 is a subsidiary legislation passed by the National Assembly and the appointment of an IGP is by the constitution, conferred on the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

President Buhari and Malami, who are 1st and 3rd defendants in the suit, therefore, prayed the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s suit with a heavy cost for being frivolous, unmeritorious and undeserving of the time of the court.

• Lack of service stalls hearing of suit seeking Adamu’s removal

Meanwhile, lack of service of court processes on the Nigeria Police Council on Tuesday stalled the hearing of a suit seeking Adamu’s removal from office.

At the resumed hearing of the matter on Tuesday, counsel to the plaintiff, Ezikiel Ugochukwu, asked the court for a stand-down of proceedings for 45 minutes to enable him to file his response to the counter-affidavit of the 1st and 3rd respondents.

He said the respondents, in their various counter-affidavit, raised the issue of jurisdiction of the court to entertain the matter.

But, counsel to the IGP, Dr Alex Izinyon (SAN), in his response said there was no need for the plaintiff to ask for a stand-down as he was within time to file his response.

However, hearing in the matter could not go on as the 4th respondent (Police council) was not represented in court as the findings of the court showed that they were not served with hearing notice on the matter.

According to the trial judge, Justice Ahmed Ramat Mohammed, “looking at the Originating Summons and hearing notice, it is clear that there is doubt that the 4th defendant was not served.

“To be on the safer side, this matter has to be adjourned to enable service on the 4th defendant,” he said.

The judge then adjourned the matter till March 30, 2021, to enable service of court processes on the 4th defendant, who should file and serve a response within seven days.

Okpara is also asking the court to restrain Adamu from exercising any form of command over officers of the
Nigeria Police Force.

He argued that Adamu’s tenure has elapsed on February 1, 2021, by virtue of the Police Act.

According to him, Adamu completed his tenure on February 1, 2021, after completing 35 years in office as Nigeria Police required by the Act.

In the originating summons numbered FHC/ABJ/CS/106/2021, the plaintiff wants the court to determine whether by provisions section 215, 216 and section 7 of the Nigeria Police Act 2020, Adamu can continue to function as IG after February 1, 2021.

He also wants the court to determine whether the failure of President Buhari and the Nigeria Police Council to appoint another IGP does not constitute an abdication of their duties.

A10-paragraph affidavit deposed to by the plaintiff (Maxwell Okpara), stated that though, Adamu is no longer a serving police officer but has continued to function in that capacity.

The plaintiff urged the court to determine if the continued stay in office by Adamu has not breached the provisions of the Constitution and the Nigerian Police Act and prayed the court to declare as illegal, null and void all actions taken by Adamu from midnight of February 1, 2021.

YOU SHOULD NOT MISS THESE HEADLINES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE

We Have Not Had Water Supply In Months ― Abeokuta Residents

In spite of the huge investment in the water sector by the government and international organisations, water scarcity has grown to become a perennial nightmare for residents of Abeokuta, the Ogun State capital. This report x-rays the lives and experiences of residents in getting clean, potable and affordable water amidst the surge of COVID-19 cases in the state.

You might also like
Comments

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. AcceptRead More