Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s confrontation with Senate President Godswill Akpabio over her sudden change of seating position exposes a deeper issue within the Nigerian Senate—a failure of internal communication and respect for due process.
This incident, seemingly minor on the surface, reveals underlying concerns about transparency, fairness, and the exercise of power within the legislative chamber.
The Role of Internal Communication in Legislative Governance
In any functional parliamentary system, effective communication ensures that lawmakers operate in an orderly, informed, and professional manner. Legislators need clear and structured information on any administrative or procedural changes, especially those affecting their seating arrangements, committee assignments, or speaking opportunities.
Seating in the Senate is not merely a matter of convenience; it holds political significance. It reflects party alignment, seniority, and committee influence. A sudden change, without prior notice, disrupts the established order and can be perceived as an attempt to marginalize or suppress a legislator’s influence.
If the Senate leadership had followed proper channels, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan would have received a formal notification explaining the reasons for her seat reassignment. Instead, the lack of communication raises serious questions about whether due process was deliberately ignored.
A Communication Breakdown: Was Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan Properly Notified?
If Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan arrived at plenary only to discover her seat had been reassigned without warning, then the Senate leadership failed in its duty to inform and consult affected members. This raises critical questions:
Who authorized the change? Was it a decision by the Senate President, the Clerk of the Senate, or an external influence?
Why was she not informed? Was it an oversight, an act of negligence, or a deliberate strategy to limit her visibility?
Has this happened before? If other senators have experienced similar treatment, this could indicate a pattern of procedural violations targeting select individuals.
Without proper justification, such a decision appears arbitrary and undemocratic, undermining the credibility of the Senate as a democratic institution.
Senate Leadership and Akpabio’s Management Style
If the decision to relocate Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan was unilateral, it exposes a troubling approach to leadership. A Senate President who makes critical decisions without consulting affected members risks creating a climate of authoritarianism rather than democratic engagement.
Unilateral actions of this nature suggest:
- A disregard for internal transparency, making it difficult for senators to trust the leadership.
- An attempt to sideline vocal opposition figures, potentially weakening debate and legislative scrutiny.
- A dangerous precedent, where the Senate President or leadership can make arbitrary decisions without accountability.
If such decisions continue, the Senate risks descending into a toxic environment, marked by power struggles, diminishing unity, and declining effectiveness. Even ruling party senators who value due process may begin to question Akpabio’s leadership if key decisions are shrouded in secrecy and selective enforcement of rules.
A Political Strategy to Weaken the Opposition?
Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan, a vocal PDP representative from Kogi, holds a strong opposition presence in a Senate dominated by the APC. If her seat reassignment was a calculated move, it could be part of a larger strategy to weaken opposition voices.
Possible motivations behind this action could include:
Reducing her visibility and influence in debates.
Creating unnecessary distractions to disrupt her legislative focus.
Testing opposition lawmakers’ reactions, to gauge how much pushback Senate leadership can expect.
If the APC leadership begins arbitrarily reassigning seats to control opposition lawmakers, it could erode public confidence in the Senate’s independence. A legislature that serves as an extension of the ruling party rather than an independent body weakens democracy and damages the credibility of its leadership.
The Need for Senate Communication and Internal Reforms
To prevent such unprofessional and undemocratic incidents in the future, the Senate must implement stronger internal communication protocols:
- Formal Notification Processes – Any change in seating, committee roles, or other legislative arrangements must be communicated through official written notices or briefings.
- Respect for Legislative Fairness – All senators, regardless of party affiliation, must be treated with equal respect and procedural fairness.
- Avoidance of Arbitrary Decisions – The Senate should function as a forum for national governance, not a battleground for partisan power plays.
- A Clear Grievance Mechanism – If senators face unjust administrative decisions, there should be a formal appeal process to challenge such actions.
Implementing these reforms would restore confidence in Senate leadership and ensure that parliamentary procedures remain fair, transparent, and inclusive.
Conclusion: A Bad Look for Senate Credibility
This incident exposes serious flaws in the Senate’s internal communication and governance. If Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan was moved without prior notification, it reflects a lack of professionalism and respect for lawmakers’ rights. If this was a deliberate political maneuver, it signals a troubling trend of opposition suppression.
Senate President Akpabio must recognize that a divided and distrusting Senate weakens not only his leadership but also the institution he oversees. If such incidents continue, they could backfire politically, diminishing his credibility and that of the APC leadership ahead of 2027.
Ultimately, this incident should serve as a wake-up call for internal reforms. A legislature that operates on the principles of due process, fairness, and democratic accountability will command greater respect from both lawmakers and the Nigerian people.
Ambassador T. Brikins
Mass Communications and Competitive Intelligence Consultant.
and then