US may abandon automatic protections for Nato countries – Trump

DONALD Trump has said that if he is elected president he may abandon a guarantee of protection to fellow Nato countries.
Speaking to the New York Times, Mr Trump said the United States would only come to the aid of allies if they have “fulfilled their obligations to us”.
Members of Nato have all signed a treaty that says they will come to the aid of any member that is attacked.
Mr Trump will speak on Thursday at the Republican National Convention.
In a preview of what he will tell convention-goers in his speech, he outlined a foreign policy strategy aimed at reducing US expenditure and involvement abroad.
Although the White House has not responded directly to Mr Trump’s comments, spokesman Josh Earnest said on Thursday the US commitment to NATO was “ironclad”.
He said potential enemies should not misjudge Washington’s commitment to defend its NATO allies.
“The president renewed that commitment just two weeks ago today when he travelled to Warsaw, Poland, to attend the NATO summit.”
Mr Trump’s comments hit at the fundamental basis of the Atlantic alliance; that an attack on one ally is an attack on all.
Under Article 5 of Nato’s founding treaty, allies are bound to come to the aid of a member under attack.
The US has long been pressing its European allies to spend more on defence. That is slowly beginning to have an effect.
But never has there been a suggestion that the US would renege on its responsibilities.
His comments on Turkey suggest that the Republican contender also seems reluctant to insist upon Nato members maintaining strong democratic principles.
Mr Trump’s positions will be seen by Washington’s Nato partners as at best eccentric and at worst alarming.
At a time of growing tensions with Moscow, the idea that the US might become an unreliable ally is a nightmare for Nato’s European members.
Asked about Russian aggression towards Nato countries in the Baltic region, Mr Trump suggested the US might abandon the longstanding protections offered by the US to such nations.
The divisive Republican candidate also said that, if elected, he would not pressure US allies over crackdowns on political opposition and civil liberties, arguing that the US had to “fix our own mess” before “lecturing” other nations.
He said: “Look at what is happening in our country. How are we going to lecture when people are shooting policemen in cold blood?”