The Supreme Court has again, struck out an appeal filed by the Hope Democratic Party (HDP) and its Presidential candidate, Ambrose Owuru challenging the declaration of President Muhammadu Buhari as the winner of the February 23 presidential election by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
The apex court struck out the appeal following the withdrawal of an application praying for the restoration of the appeal to be heard afresh.
Owuru and HDP had sought leave of the court to allow them to bring back their appeal which had been struck out due to errors of filling two notices of appeal in respect of one matter and against the provisions of the law.
When the matter came up on Monday, the attention of the counsel to the appellants Sunday Ezema was drawn to section 285 (7) of the 1999 constitution and was asked whether the appeal has not become statute barred.
Although the counsel initially insisted the appeal can still be heard, he however made a u-turn and applied for withdrawal of the application.
Justice Olukayode Ariwoola who led four other Justices in a short ruling struck out the application.
ALSO READ: Nearly 90m Nigerians live in extreme poverty ― Minister
Justice Ariwoola declined to award cost against the appellants as demanded by INEC’s counsel, Yunus Usman (SAN) and that of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Yakubu Maikyau (SAN).
Buhari’s counsel, Wole Olanipekun (SAN,) did not ask for cost against the two appellants but, objected to the application of the appellants to hear their appeal afresh on the grounds that time to do so had lapsed, became statute barred and that the court no longer has jurisdiction.
He argued that the appellants were not fair to the court by engaging it, “in a non-justiciable application that will serve no purpose other than wasting precious time of the court.”
The position was adopted by counsel to INEC and APC but with demand for substantial cost against the appellants for wasting the time of the court with the frivolous application.
Justice Ariwoola in the ruling agreed that the application of the appellants had been caught up by section 285 of the 1999 constitution and as such no longer has a life to maintain it
HDP had filed a fresh motion to challenge the way and manners its appeal against President Buhari’s election was determined and struck out on what it termed technicality rather than the merit of law.
The party, in the new motion, had asked the apex court to reverse itself in the ruling delivered on October 3 and restore the appeal for a fresh hearing on merit rather than on technicality of filing two notices of appeal together in one matter.
In the fresh motion on notice, the party and Owuru, claimed that the judgment delivered by Justice Mary Peter Odili in favour of Buhari was invalid on the ground that it was based on technicalities of law rather than merit and justice.
The motion filed by Mr Chukwunonyerem Njoku on behalf of the appellants pleaded with the court to restore their appeal for a fresh hearing.
The HDP and its candidate maintained that the striking out of their appeal on technical ground was without compliance with the mandatory procedure of law.
Justice Odili who delivered the judgment held that Owuru and HDP failed to appeal against the ruling delivered by the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal on August 22 which struck out their petition based on the lack of jurisdiction.
“The two notices of appeal filed by the appellants and jointly utilised is a procedure not backed by law and cannot be used,” she said.
In their petition at the tribunal, they had prayed for nullification of the February 23 election on the ground that its shift from February 16 by INEC to February 23 was not in compliance with any law and as such a nullity.
The two appellants claimed that a referendum election was conducted by Nigerians on February I6 and won by them with over 50 million voice votes and that the Chief Justice of Nigeria (CJN) should be ordered to inaugurate them as President of Nigeria based on the referendum election results.
and then