Plateau cannot survive on declarations alone

GOVERNOR Caleb Mutfwang has finally spoken with the urgency many citizens of Plateau State have waited years to hear. His declaration of a “state of war against terrorists and enemies of the state” is not just another government phrase thrown into the media cycle. It is an acknowledgment of a painful truth that ordinary villagers, displaced families, grieving mothers, and traumatised communities have lived with for years: Plateau is bleeding, and the bleeding has lasted far too long.

For once, the government is no longer pretending that these killings are ordinary communal misunderstandings or random clashes between neighbours. What Plateau faces today is organised violence, coordinated attacks, territorial intimidation, and the systematic destruction of human life. Entire communities now sleep with one eye open. Farmers are afraid to return to their lands. Villages are emptied overnight. Children are growing up hearing gunshots more often than laughter. The fear has become cultural. The trauma has become generational. So yes, the governor deserves credit for finally speaking firmly. Leadership sometimes begins with naming a problem honestly. But the people of Plateau have also heard many strong speeches before. They have watched governments visit attack sites, condemn killings, promise justice, convene security meetings, and declare zero tolerance, only for the same cycle to repeat itself weeks later. This is why declarations alone will no longer satisfy the public. Plateau people are tired of official sympathy without lasting security. They are tired of mourning becoming a routine part of governance.

ALSO READ: VeryDarkMan must face weight of law over fake Tinubu audio — Presidency

The truth is simple: if this is truly a war, then government must act like it is facing a war. The governor must now put his money where his mouth is. One of the biggest weaknesses in Nigeria’s fight against banditry and mass killings is the gap between crime and consequence. Armed men invade villages, burn homes, massacre civilians, disappear into forests and, in many cases, the legal system moves too slowly, too weakly, or not at all. Arrests are rare. Convictions are even rarer. Communities are left with the dangerous impression that killers fear nothing: not the law, not the state, not even public outrage. This is why Governor Mutfwang should immediately work with the Plateau State House of Assembly to push for stronger security legislation within constitutional limits. If the state can declare war on terror, then it should also create laws that reflect the seriousness of that declaration. Why shouldn’t Plateau have special courts or accelerated judicial procedures for terrorism, mass murder, illegal arms possession, kidnapping, and violent occupation of communities? Why should those who aid attackers with logistics, intelligence, or safe havens continue operating comfortably while innocent citizens are buried almost weekly?

A society where consequences are uncertain eventually becomes attractive to criminals. The governor should also champion a more systematic and regional approach to security. Criminal networks do not respect state boundaries. Attackers move through forests and rural corridors stretching across Plateau, Benue, Nasarawa, Kaduna, and parts of Taraba. This is why the idea of a North Central regional security outfit, similar in coordination spirit to Amotekun Corps, deserves serious consideration. Local intelligence matters. Community trust matters. Familiarity with terrain matters. Security cannot remain completely centralised in a country with Nigeria’s size and complexity.

At the same time, the governor must avoid turning this declaration into political theatre ahead of future elections. Plateau people are emotionally exhausted. They do not need another season of dramatic speeches designed to create the image of toughness. They need sustained action. They need villages protected before attacks happen, not condolences after funerals. They need intelligence-driven policing, rapid response systems, technological surveillance, and security institutions that remain active even when media attention fades. The governor also made a mistake by suggesting that Plateau has only been under siege for four months. No. Plateau has been under siege for decades. The wounds did not begin yesterday. From the Jos crises of the early 2000s to recurring attacks in Riyom, Barkin Ladi, Bassa, Bokkos, and Mangu, the state has lived through cycles of violence for years. Entire generations have grown up normalising displacement camps, emergency curfews, and mass burials. That historical reality matters because it reminds us that this crisis cannot be solved with temporary outrage or emergency declarations alone. It requires long-term political will.

And while some Fulani groups have criticized the governor’s measures as harsh, the truth is that every government facing serious insecurity eventually imposes restrictions in the interest of public safety. The real issue is fairness and implementation. Security measures must not become tools for ethnic profiling or collective punishment. They must be lawful, intelligence-based, and applied without bias. Justice loses legitimacy the moment it begins to look selective. Ultimately, Plateau stands at an important crossroads. The governor has raised expectations with his strong language. Citizens now expect strong action to follow. This is no longer the time for ceremonial governance. Plateau has buried too many people for politics as usual. If Governor Mutfwang truly wants history to remember him differently, then he must move beyond declarations and build institutions capable of protecting lives long after political headlines disappear.

This is because in the end, states are not judged by the speeches their leaders make during crises. They are judged by whether ordinary people can sleep safely when the speeches are over.