FG’s UTME waiver for college of education candidates

THE Federal Government’s decision to exempt candidates seeking admission into Colleges of Education and certain non-technology agricultural programmes from the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) has triggered one of the most important educational debates Nigeria has confronted in recent years. Announced by the Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, during the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) annual policy meeting held on Monday, May 11, 2026, in Abuja, the reform represents a significant shift in tertiary admission policy. Under the new framework, candidates seeking admission into Nigeria Certificate in Education (NCE) programmes no longer need to sit for the UTME. Applicants require only four relevant O-Level credit passes, must still register with JAMB, and will be processed through the Central Admissions Processing System (CAPS). The government argues that the policy seeks to reduce entry barriers, reverse declining enrolment in colleges of education, address teacher shortages, and potentially bring as many as 1.5 million additional youths into tertiary education. These are not trivial objectives.

Nigeria indeed faces a serious educational challenge. Many colleges of education reportedly attract fewer than 100 first-choice applicants despite substantial infrastructural investments. Teacher shortages remain severe, especially in rural and underserved communities. Financial pressures and multiple examination layers also impose burdens on students from poor backgrounds. But while the diagnosis may be partly correct, the prescription appears dangerously incomplete. The central problem with this policy is not merely administrative. It is philosophical and symbolic. By removing the UTME requirement specifically for teacher-training institutions, the government risks communicating that teaching requires lower standards than other professions. That signal may unintentionally deepen the very crisis it hopes to solve.

READ ALSO: COEASU flays FG over cancellation of UTME for NCE candidates

No education system can rise above the quality of its teachers. And no nation strengthens its future by lowering the prestige attached to teacher formation. This explains why opposition to the policy has emerged sharply from the Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT). The union’s warning that bypassing UTME could weaken the professionalism of teaching deserves serious consideration, not dismissal. Once society begins to perceive colleges of education as institutions with reduced academic thresholds, the long-term reputational damage may prove difficult to reverse. The irony is painful. Nigeria constantly declares education to be the foundation of national development, yet the pathway for producing teachers is increasingly treated as a sector requiring easier standards rather than deeper investment and higher prestige. Countries that have built strong educational systems do precisely the opposite. In many high-performing societies, admission into teacher education is competitive because teaching is regarded as a strategic national profession. Nigeria’s crisis is therefore unlikely to be fundamentally about the UTME.

The real issue is that the teaching profession itself has become unattractive. Young Nigerians are not abandoning education courses simply because of examinations. They are abandoning them because teachers are poorly paid, schools are underfunded, career advancement is uncertain, and the profession no longer guarantees social dignity or economic stability. A graduate who sees teachers struggling to pay rent, unable to afford transportation, and working under difficult conditions naturally looks elsewhere. That is the crisis government should confront. If the objective is genuinely to attract more people into teacher education, then reform must begin with restoring the social and economic value of teaching itself. Competitive salaries, subsidised housing, vehicle financing schemes, improved school infrastructure, digital teaching tools, professional training, and merit-based career progression would do more to revive colleges of education than lowering admission barriers. Talented students should aspire to become teachers because the profession commands respect, stability, and opportunity — not because entry has become easier.

The same concerns apply to the extension of the waiver to agriculture-related National Diploma programmes. Agriculture remains critical to Nigeria’s food security and economic diversification. Yet, lowering barriers without simultaneously strengthening quality assurance, technical training capacity, and graduate opportunities risks repeating a familiar national pattern: expanding quantity while weakening standards. To be fair, the government’s desire to widen educational access is understandable. Millions of Nigerian youths remain outside the tertiary system, and bureaucratic bottlenecks should not become instruments of exclusion.  There is also merit in questioning whether the UTME should remain the sole gateway into every form of post-secondary education. But reform requires balance. Alternative pathways could have been explored without sending troubling signals about educational standards. The government could have adopted lower UTME cut-offs for colleges of education, introduced specialised teacher aptitude assessments, expanded foundation programmes, provided scholarships tied to service obligations, or created targeted recruitment schemes for underserved regions. Such measures would have expanded access while preserving institutional credibility.

Educational reform must also emerge from broad consultation. Policies affecting national human capital development should involve teacher unions, colleges of education, state governments, educational researchers, school administrators, and civil society stakeholders. Durable reforms are rarely built through unilateral announcements alone. Ultimately, the debate triggered by this policy extends beyond admissions. It forces Nigeria to confront a deeper national question: What value does the country truly place on teaching? If the nation genuinely believes that teachers shape the future, then teacher education should become more respected, more competitive, and more professionally rewarding — not less. Access matters. But access without excellence is not reform. It is merely expansion without direction.