The Supreme Court, on Tuesday, fixed December 9, 2016 to deliver judgment in a suit challenging the propriety of the nomination of Governor Aminu Tambuwal of Sokoto State, by the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the 2015 gubernatorial election held in the state.
The apex court will on that day declare whether Tambuwal was nominated in compliance with provisions of the Electoral Act 2010 and the APC 2014 guidelines for the nomination of candidates for elective offices.
The apex court will also determine the issue of swapping of delegates list at the primary election of the APC said to have been conducted on December 4, 2014 at Giginya Stadium in Sokoto.
Justice Bode Rhodes Vivour, who presided over a session of the court in the matter, fixed December 9 date after submissions by various parties in the appeal.
Two appellants, Alhaji Umaru Dahiru and Barrister Aliyu Abubakar Sanyinna, who were governorship aspirants on the APC platform in the 2015 general election filed the appeal.
In their brief of arguments filed by Professor Awa Kalu, the two appellants pleaded with the apex court to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeal which held that their suit had become academic exercise by virtue of the election of Tambuwal in the April 11, 2015 governorship poll.
In the brief of argument adopted by Mr Ikoro M. Ikoro, the two appellants insisted that the lower court (Appeal Court) erred in law by holding that their joint suit had no life to sustain it simply because of the conducted general election.
They argued that the April 11, 2015 general election could not take life out of their case or render it academic exercise because the suit was filed on January 27, 2015 long before the general election was conducted.
The appellants chronicled the genesis of their suit, claiming that several frivolous motions and applications filed by the respondents at the Federal High Court in Abuja delayed judgment delivery until after the general election.
Their counsel argued that since all the delay tactics were at the instance of the respondents, they should not be allowed to be beneficiaries of the unjust delays which made expeditious hearing practically impossible.
Respondents in the appeal are the APC, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Honourable Tambuwal.
But counsel for Tambuwal, Mr Sunday Ibrahim Ameh, stood his ground that the reliefs sought by the appellants at the Federal High Court had been overtaken by the general election and the declaration of Tambuwal as winner of the April 11, 2015 election.
The counsel urged the court to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it had become pure academic issue.
In his own argument, Mr Jibrin Okutepa, representing APC, aligned himself with the third respondent’s submission.
The appellants had, at the Federal High Court sued Tambuwal and asked the court to declare that the primary election of the APC, held on December 4, 2014, which produced him, was unlawful, unconstitutional, null and void and inconsistent with the Electoral Act, 2010 and the APC guidelines.
They claimed that the list of accredited delegates was swapped at the election venue and that votes were arbitrarily, unlawfully and fraudulently allocated to the aspirants after series of manipulation, intimidation and threat from the then state government officials backing the third respondent.
They asked for the court order restraining INEC from acting, publishing or recognising Tambuwal as the APC gubernatorial candidate.
They also prayed for an order nullifying or withdrawing the nomination of Tambuwal and that a fresh primary election be ordered.
Justice Evoh Stephen Chukwu of the Federal High Court, Abuja, now late, ruled in their favour.
But the appeal court, in its judgment delivered by Justice Moore Adumein, set aside the decision of the trial court and held that the reliefs of the plaintiffs could not be granted again in view of the 2015 governorship poll already won by Tambuwal.