A prominent civil society group, the Electoral Integrity and Good Governance Initiative, has said that Supreme Court judgement on Kogi Governorship election will not only impact the citizens of Kogi State but also serve as a precedent for future elections and legal disputes across Nigeria.
This is contained in a statement issued on Wednesday and made available to pressmen by the spokesperson of the group, Barrister Aishat Ohunene.
The group also called on the Supreme Court to prioritise the relevance of evidence over its source in the ongoing Kogi State gubernatorial election dispute.
The group emphasised the importance of considering all relevant evidence, regardless of its origin, to ensure substantial justice in the highly contentious legal battle.
According to her; “These rulings emphasize that admissible evidence should be determined by its relevance to the case rather than its source.” The group argues that dwelling on the origin of evidence may lead to the exclusion of crucial information and potentially result in an unjust outcome.
“As the Kogi State gubernatorial election case remains a subject of legal contention, it is essential to revisit the Supreme Court’s consistent stance on prioritizing relevance in evidence consideration. In doing so, we examine six critical rulings that uphold this principle and underscore its significance in the pursuit of substantial justice.”
The group cited six critical rulings by the Supreme Court that uphold the principle of prioritizing relevance in evidence consideration.
That of Okeowo v. Migliore (2018) 12 NWLR (Pt. 1635) 31: “The admissibility of evidence is determined by its relevance, not its source.”, Ogboru v. Uduaghan (2011) 4 NWLR (Pt. 1237) 393:
“Relevance is the hallmark of admissibility of evidence. If evidence is relevant, it is admissible, regardless of its source and Nwosu v. Uba (2014) 14 NWLR (Pt. 1426) 1: “The court should consider the relevance of evidence, not its origin. Evidence is admissible if it is relevant to the facts in issue.”
Others she cited includes Akinloye v. Eyitayo (2007) 18 NWLR (Pt. 1066) 457: “The source of evidence does not determine its admissibility. What matters is the relevance of the evidence to the facts in dispute, Okoro v. State (2018) 13 NWLR (Pt. 1632) 1: “Evidence is admissible if it is relevant, regardless of how it was obtained. The court should focus on the relevance, not the source and Ogbunyiya v. Okudo (2019) 16 NWLR (Pt. 1698) 1:
“The admissibility of evidence depends on its relevance, not its sources. Relevant evidence is admissible, even if it comes from a questionable source.
“The Electoral Integrity and Good Governance Initiative believes that prioritizing relevance over the source of evidence will be key to delivering a just and fair verdict in the Kogi State gubernatorial election case.”
ALSO READ THESE TOP STORIES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE
Dangote Refinery debunks reports of projected fuel price hike
and then