EFCC’s Uyo hospital operation

AN operation by operatives of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission at the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital reportedly triggered panic within the federal health facility, disrupted medical services, and forced health workers to abandon wards amid safety concerns. According to multiple reports, armed operatives stormed the hospital premises in what witnesses described as a commando-style operation. Videos circulating online showed scenes of chaos, with patients, workers and visitors running after alleged firing of teargas and warning shots. The operation reportedly led to the arrest of Professor Eyo Ekpe, Deputy Chairman of the Medical Advisory Committee and a renowned cardiothoracic surgeon.

The EFCC exists to fight corruption, and Nigerians should support every lawful effort to strengthen accountability. If forged medical reports were indeed being used to obstruct investigations or manipulate judicial processes, such conduct would itself be deeply troubling. No institution should become a shield for criminality. However, anti-corruption agencies must operate within the boundaries of proportionality, professionalism and institutional restraint.

Hospitals are not ordinary operational environments. They are sensitive spaces where panic can endanger lives, interrupt emergency care, destabilise critical medical procedures and compromise patient safety. The threshold for forceful intervention inside a hospital must therefore be exceptionally high. If the objective was merely to verify the authenticity of a medical report, serious questions arise about why such an operation escalated into public disorder. University and hospital authorities could have been formally engaged. The Chief Medical Director, Registrar, Vice Chancellor, or relevant administrative officials could have facilitated cooperation. If prior correspondence from the EFCC went unanswered, legal and institutional escalation mechanisms remained available, including court-backed enforcement processes.

The subsequent revelation that the professor himself may not even have been the suspect under investigation has further complicated public perception. A man publicly associated with a dramatic enforcement operation inevitably suffers reputational injury, even before any wrongdoing is established. That is why law enforcement agencies must exercise caution against creating the impression of guilt before due process is completed. At the same time, institutions must also cooperate responsibly with lawful investigations. If indeed official EFCC inquiries were ignored, delayed, or obstructed, that too reflects institutional failure. Public institutions cannot selectively decide which lawful requests to honour. There are also reports that EFCC operatives came under attack and were stoned during the operation. If true, security personnel are legally permitted to protect themselves. But that still does not fully explain why an operation involving document verification evolved into scenes resembling a tactical raid. The matter therefore requires thorough and transparent investigation.

ALSO READ: Why I signed Obasa’s impeachment notice — Desmond Elliot

This incident is bigger than one professor, one hospital, or even one anti-corruption operation. It raises broader questions about the culture of enforcement in Nigeria, the relationship between state power and civic institutions, and the standards expected in democratic governance. The fight against corruption is necessary. But anti-corruption itself must remain accountable to law, proportionality and institutional discipline. A state that fights corruption while disregarding procedural restraint risks weakening the very legitimacy upon which lawful enforcement depends.

We acknowledge the fact that, following public outcry, the EFCC has tendered an apology over this incident. That is the appropriate and commendable thing to do.