Latest News

Court restrains House of Reps from conducting public hearing on law school hijab controversy

THE Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday ordered the House of Representatives to refrain from conducting the planned public hearing on the Hijab controversy generated by a Nigerian Law School graduate, Firdrusa Abdulsalam, the at the call to bar ceremony held in Abuja last year.

Justice Anwuli Chkere gave the order yesterday while delivering a ruling on an application filed by a coalition of law students seeking to stop the public hearing.

She ordered that the lawmakers halt the public hearing pending the determination of the substantive suit.

The court held that the plaintiffs, who are legal practitioners, had a right to bring the action since the decision of the House of Representatives would affect them.

Justice Chikere subsequently adjourned the matter till April 24, 2018, for the hearing of the substantive suit.

It will be recalled that Abdulsalam, a law graduate, was on December 13, 2017, not called to the Nigerian Bar on the grounds that she wore a Hijab to the call to bar ceremony.

The matter was taken to the House of Representatives and a public hearing was fixed in respect of the matter.

The lawyers, under the aegis, Coalition of Lawyers for the Preservation of Legal Practitioners’ Ethics then filed a suit asking the court to stop the House of Representatives from conducting the public hearing.

Their counsel, Mr Sunday Akanni, told the court that the lawyers had even undertaken that they would pay damages to the lawmakers in the event that their application was found to be frivolous.

He said they were seeking the interpretation of the court in regards to Sections 33 to 45 of the 1999 Constitution as well as Section 88.

“We brought the House of Representatives to court because of the public hearing.

“Our contention is very simple, the public hearing notice they sent is in respect of a lady called Abdulsalam Firdrusa who was not called to the bar on December 13, 2017, because she was wearing hijab.

“They say the public hearing is pursuant to Section 45 of the Constitution but we are saying it has to do with violation of rights and it is the court that can look into such matters.

“It is not for the House of Representatives to conduct a public hearing. Section 88 and 89 gives power to the house of representatives to conduct public hearing but Section 33 to 45 is what we call fundamental rights.

“If that right is breached where are you supposed to go, public hearing or court?”, he asked.

S-Davies Wande

Recent Posts

We receive over 1,800 loan applications from students daily – NELFUND

NELFUNDhas disclosed that the Fund now receives an average of 1,800 student loan applications daily,…

7 minutes ago

Insurgents use armed drones, sophisticated weapons — Reps

Aggrieved members of the House of Representatives on Tuesday, expressed grave concerns over the heinous…

10 minutes ago

Africa’s economic future tied to secure data sharing — VP Shettima

Vice President Kashim Shettima has emphasised that Africa’s economic prosperity hinges on the continent’s ability…

16 minutes ago

National housing policy to address rising cost of rent, others — NIESV

"If we have that, then we will be able to use the instrumentality of that…

33 minutes ago

Gov Nwifuru has kept campaign promises — Commissioner

Ebonyi State Commissioner for Works, Mr Lebechi Mbam, has noted that Governor Francis Nwifuru has…

36 minutes ago

Red flags! Seven ways to identify a Ponzi scheme

Investing is one of the best ways to grow your money, but it also comes…

42 minutes ago

Welcome

Install

This website uses cookies.