States’ VAT management will cause confusion —FIRS

Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) said on Wednesday that there will be confusion is states take over the management of value-added tax (VAT).

At a briefing in Abuja, FIRS Group Lead, Special Tax Operations Group, Mr Matthew Gbonjubola said “it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to operate VAT at sub-national level.”

“Just to illustrate it, assuming a business person bought an item, let’s say in Osun State and takes the goods to let’s say Sokoto State to sell, remember that this business person has paid VAT while purchasing the goods in Osun State, and when selling in Sokoto State, he will charge VAT. 

“By the operation of the input/output mechanism, this business person will deduct the input tax paid in Osun State from the output tax charged in Sokoto state and remit any difference to the relevant tax authorities. 

“In this case the relevant tax authorities handling VAT is the FIRS. 

“It is the same tax authorities that received the VAT in Osun State that receives the output tax in Sokoto state.”

“So it is easy to work out the input /output mechanism and there is no issue of the business person being shortchanged. There is no issue with the consumer paying VAT more than once.

“However, if this is operated at the state level, it will mean that when the business person is paying that VAT at the state of source, and we have said, for instance, Osun State, Osun State will have collected that money.

“And when that business person is selling that same item in Sokoto, they will charge VAT. 

“The dilemma is . how will the business person recoup the VAT paid at the point where the products were purchased?

“Either of two things will happen. Either Osun state will have to refund the VAT collected or Sokoto will have to absorb that loss. That, in itself, will create confusion.

“And that is why there is no country in the world that does that.”

Gbonjubola said, “the VAT law abrogated all sales taxes at the time it was enacted and upon the advent of the current democratic dispensation, the VAT decree became an Act of the National Assembly and it has remained so until now.”

He noted besides that bulk of VAT revenue comes from imports, as well as, federal government Ministries Departments and Agencies (MDAs) contractors makes it impossible for states to administer the tax.

According to him, no state government controls any port and that as such, it would be very difficult, if not impossible for sub-nationals to collect VAT.

“There are three very important avenues of VAT collection. 

“One is VAT on imported items- which is collected at the ports of entry. 

“As at today, there is no state government that controls any port in Nigeria, which is why it is a lot easier for the FIRS to administer VAT.

“The second source of VAT is the one we pay when we go to shops and buy things.

“The third which contributes a substantial volume of VAT is the one paid by MDAs when contracts are awarded –either contracts for construction supplies or services. That is why if you look at VAT today, after Lagos, because we have many ports in Lagos, FCT comes second because the majority of contract awards are from the federal ministries and VAT collected in respect of those ministries are from the federal manufacturer.

“As to the incidence of VAT, VAT is practised on an input/output mechanism.  

“What it means is that for a business either importing or buying products for re-sale, that business will pay VAT either at the port, if it is importing or to the manufacturer if it is buying from a local manufacturer.

“And when that business pays VAT, it is considered as an input tax, such that if they begin to sell in any part of Nigeria and charges VAT, to its customers, it is able to recoup the VAT paid either at the ports or to the manufacturers.”

YOU SHOULD NOT MISS THESE HEADLINES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE

Lagos Is Second Least Liveable City In The World For 2021

Lagos is the second least liveable city in the world for the year 2021. This is according to the most recent annual ranking put together by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU)…

FACT CHECK: Did UNICEF Say Blocking Children’s Access To Pornography Constitutes Human Rights’ Infringement?

CLAIM 1: A Twitter user claims UNICEF said any efforts to block children from accessing pornography might infringe their human rights.

VERDICT: MISLEADING!