Shariah panels boost for legal plurality, not divisive measure — NACOMYO

THE National Council of Muslim Youth Organisations (NACOMYO) has asked opponents of proposed Shariah arbitration panels in South West states to see the panels as an enhancement of legal plurality, as enshrined in the constitution, rather than a divisive measure.

The council, in a statement in Abuja by its National Secretary General, Alhaj Mas’ud Akintola, decried the opposition to the Islamic legal system, describing it as preposterous and a height of insensitivity and intolerance.

NACOMYO cautioned political and traditional authorities against attempts to “impose narrow perspectives on Muslims,” saying such would amount to undermining their rights.

It said: “The assertion that Shariah will destabilise the South West is not only unfounded but also absurd. Shariah provides a framework that reflects the beliefs of Muslims and aligns with local values.

“The fear of destabilisation appears to stem more from anarchist rhetoric than from any historical or substantive evidence relating to Shariah’s role in our society.

“Moreover, claims regarding an impending imposition of Shariah law ignore its voluntary nature for those who choose to adhere to Islamic tenets. Attempts to ban or mobilise against Shariah reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of religious freedom, which allows individuals to practise their beliefs without infringing on the rights of others.”

Read Also: NUPTE condemns 50 percent telecom tariff hike

“It is pertinent to note that Shariah panels arbitrate over marital issues, inheritance, child custody and guardianship, Imamship, and related matters which are not issues that can’t be resolved outside the judicial system. In fact, our statutes recognise the alternative dispute resolution mechanism.