Appeal Court reserves judgment in N703m copyright infringement award

A three-member panel of justices of the appellate court, presided by Justice Stephen Adah on Thursday reserved the judgement after counsel in the mater adopted their briefs.

Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja had, on May 6, 2020 awarded N700 million to TV Xtra in both special and general damages and N3 million cost of the suit, after it found that Zain and NUC aired a programme designed by TV Xtra without permission in 2009.

Arguing the appeals, counsel to NUC, Solomon Akuma (SAN) and Zain, Rotimi Oguneso (SAN) urged the Appeal Court to nullify the judgement of the trial court for lack of jurisdiction as the suit was statuette-barred, having been filed after three months of the cause of action and

NUC contended that Justice Ekwo erred in law which occasioned a miscarriage of justice when he failed to give it opportunity to defend the case when it started de novo, adding that it was not given opportunity to cross-examine two witnesses after the court adopted the evidence given in the previous trial court presided by Justice Gabriel Kolawole.

But counsel to TV Xtra, Okechukwu Uju-Azorji Esq urged the court to dismiss the appeals, adding that said the parties were given adequate time to defend the matter at the high court but failed to do so.

TV Xtra Production’s CEO and General Editor, Arise News, Christian Ojorovwu Ogodo, who designed and registered the quiz programme, ‘University Challenge’ with the NUC and presented it to NUC for Nigerian schools.

He told the court that he was surprised to see the programme being aired on televisions by NUC and Zain four weeks after he made the presentation to the NUC.

Zain Nigeria in its defence contended that TV Xtra is not the original owner of the programme, explaining that the idea was picked from a similar programme, the British Universities Challenge.

But Justice Ekwo ruled that the defendants misunderstood the case of plaintiff who is seeking remedy for his work, not in any other part of the world, but registered in Nigeria and which existed at the time it was aired in Nigeria.

He added that airing the programme on AIT and NTA without the permission of the author violated sections 2(a) (1), 6 (1) (a) (1) and 8 of the Copyrights Act.

“The law is that a work in Nigeria is the exclusive right of the owner to control the reproduction of the work in any material form and making adaptations of the work going by Section 6(1) (a) (1) and 8 of the Copyright Act,” the judge said.

“I find that the case of the plaintiff succeeds on the merit. I make an order entering judgement on the terms of the claims,” he said.

YOU SHOULD NOT MISS THESE HEADLINES FROM NIGERIAN TRIBUNE

Pollution, Deforestation: How Ignorance, Unclear Environmental Policies Influence Booming Fish Smoking Industry

Rays of the afternoon sun pelted her head as she fanned the embers beneath the half-cut iron drum with the smoke permeating the air. “This smoke is unbearable, Iya Maria,” said one of the three neighbours conversing under a makeshift shed about five meters away. Their voices rose and fell intermittently…