Presidential poll: Tribunal dismisses HDP’s petition against Buhari’s election

The Presidential Election Petition Tribunal, on Thursday, dismissed the petition filed the Hope Democratic Party (HDP’s) challenging the conduct of the February 23, 2019, presidential election which the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared President Muhammadu Buhari as the winner and returned him for a second term in office.

The presidential candidate of the HDP, Chief Ambrose Owuru and his party, HDP had on March 7 filed their petition seeking the nullification of President Buhari’s election on grounds that the conduct of the election on February 23 by the NEC was illegal, null and void on account of its shift from February 16 to 23.

They also asked the tribunal to declare them the winner of the presidential poll having been elected president by 50 million Nigerians through a referendum conducted on February 16, 2019.

But delivering judgment yesterday, the tribunal in a unanimous decision held that the petition which was based on a purported referendum held on February 16, 2019, was outside the jurisdiction of the tribunal, whose duty is to determine whether a person was validly elected into the office of the president of Nigeria or not.

Chairman of the tribunal, Justice Mohammed Garba, who delivered the lead judgment said the petition which on the other hand challenged the postponement of the presidential election earlier scheduled for February 16 to February 23 was at best a pre-election matter and ought to be presented at a Federal or State High Court and not the tribunal.

Justice Garba further held that the suit was liable to be dismissed on grounds that being a pre-election matter, it was also filed outside the 14 days provided by the law.

ALSO READ: Oyo Assembly screens, confirms 3 additional Commissioner-nominees

The tribunal further held that the petitioners failed to prove the allegations that they were excluded by INEC in the February 23 presidential election.

The chairman said from available exhibits before the tribunal, the 1st petitioner’s name was number 69 on INEC’s final list and that the logo of the party with fish and boat was conspicuously pasted on the ballot papers used for the February 23 presidential election.

The tribunal, therefore, held that the claim of unlawful exclusion was of no moment and at best, unwarranted.

In dismissing the petition, the tribunal held that there was no provision in the Constitution, Electoral Act and associated laws for the election of the president through a referendum and that the claim of referendum election was strange and alien to the mode of electing a president.

Justice Garba agreed that the body that conducted the purported referendum is not known to law and that the purported emergence of Chief Owuru as president through a voice vote at the referendum of over 50 million was not established, adding that the petitioner’s claim was spurious since it was only Owuru who participated in the referendum.

“This tribunal is not persuaded to invoke its powers to grant any of the reliefs sought by the petitioners because it has no jurisdiction to do so and on the fact that the petition is predicated on a purported February 16 referendum and not the election of February 23 that has the force of power.

“What is more, the only witness called by the petitioners, Yusuf Ibrahim admitted in his evidence that the February 16 referendum was not conducted by INEC and that the February 23 presidential election was conducted by INEC and that he voted thereby making the claims and reliefs of the petitioners sought from the tribunal to be flying in the air and not grantable”.

The tribunal further held that the claim of the petitioners that INEC has no power to postpone election is absurd because of the relevant laws that empower the electoral body to shift election and appoint a date for the election and that the petitioners only demonstrated lack of knowledge of the electoral law.

In conclusion, Justice Garba said that the petition is vexatious, lacking in merit, liable for dismissal and consequently dismissed having failed in all fronts.

Comments