Letters

Marriage: Reviewing ‘for better, for worse’ idea

Published by

Marriage  is a legal union between two consenting adults.

Love is a strong basis for marriage but many married people will tell you that the challenge of marriage is not love, but living together; sharing the same space and tolerating each other.

In this part of the world, the church is deeply involved with marriages; from the period of budding relationships to wedding solemnisation, ensuring that couples know and adhere to Christian tenets concerning it.

One of these is the dogma of “for better, for worse” which means the couple must accept the consequences of their decision whether the outcome is good or bad.

However, few years ago, a church had reason to change this doctrine. For decades, it had upheld and taught the usual principle “for better, for worse” and enjoined members to endure the ups and downs of their  marriages however extreme. All this  changed when a church member killed his wife.

After years of marriage and a few children, things became sore between the couple. They became incompatible as their quarrels and fights increased in frequency. The man, an elder in the church, would beat his wife for every little reason.

A few times, the woman who was also a church leader, reported her situation to the church council, but the pastor would always encourage remind her of her status as women leader and the church doctrine of “for better, for worse”.

She endured to make the marriage work; to be a good example to young couples never to give up in marriage.

On that fateful morning, as her corpse was being wheeled to the mortuary, the entire community, immediate family, and children were surprised and devastated.

The church members wondered how this could ever happen to such a “spirit-filled, tongue speaking and lovable” couple. The pastor felt very guilty because unlike other mourners, he had a chance to save the woman but rather opted otherwise, to preserve the image of the church.

However, with this incident, the church council decided to revise its stand and amend the policy concerning marriage and divorce. Even though the church encourages members to remain in their marriages, spouses who are under persistent physical abuse are now allowed to live separately (not divorce) in the interest of their safety, and also that of their children.

Perhaps all churches, as matter of responsibility and urgency, should also consider the dark side of marriage and modify doctrines so as to preserve the lives of their members because the sanctity of life far outweighs that of marriage if one were to be chosen over the other.

Dr Usha Anenga

Makurdi, Benue State.

 

Recent Posts

Gbenga Hashim Hails Sule Lamido’s Integrity at Star-Studded Book Launch, Calls for Return to Value-Based Politics

It was a day of reflection, legacy, and renewed political conviction as top political figures…

12 minutes ago

Tenants, NGOs condemn escalation of rent in Rivers

Tenants and civil society groups in Rivers State under the umbrella of Advisory Forum on…

14 minutes ago

C’River Central APC backs Tinubu, Otu for second term

Leaders, stakeholders and members of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the Central senatorial district…

44 minutes ago

‘Poor electricity supply has cost us much’

I want to report the bad electricity supply threatening the safety and wellbeing of people…

54 minutes ago

Edo NIPR sets up committee to investigate, prosecute illegal practitioners

The Edo State chapter of the Nigerian Institute of Public Relations (NIPR), has set up…

1 hour ago

Revitalising Yoruba morality: A call for indigenous educational integration

By: Akin Yewande In a time when the fabric of moral values in Yoruba society…

2 hours ago

Welcome

Install

This website uses cookies.