Latest News

Judge hands off Saraki/Sahara Reporters libel case

Published by
Senate President Bukola Saraki

A judge with the Kwara State High Court, Justice Sikiru Oyinloye, has removed himself from a contempt application filed by Senate President, Dr Bukola Saraki, against online publisher, Omoyele Sowore, and his company, Sahara Reporters.

At the court proceedings in Ilorin, on Thursday, the judge also ordered a halt to further proceedings in a substantive suit where Sowore and his company were seeking to set aside a N4 billion judgment debt earlier issued against them by the judge for publishing libellous articles against the Senate President.
The counsel to the Senate President, Mr. Babatunde Olomu, had sought to move the application for contempt proceedings against Sowore but Justice Oyinloye asked him not to do so, on the ground that the matter affected the integrity of his court.
“I do not want to be a judge in what seems to be my own case; the application is hereby directed to be taken to the Registry pronto,” the judge said, adding that he had deliberately refused to read the application since it was brought to his office.
In a short ruling thereafter, the court directed Saraki to go back to the High Court Registry and start a fresh process for the assigning of the case by the Chief Judge of the state. Oyinloye also directed the Registrar of his own court to initiate the transfer of the case file to the main Registry and undertake a daily follow-up of the file until the matter had been assigned to a new judge.
The judge later gave the two parties a new date of November 24, 2017 when they are to appear before him to give a progress report on the contempt proceedings.
Earlier during yesterday’s session, the court had fined Sahara Reporters and Sowore the sum of N20, 000 for discontinuing its their motion on notice, dated August 18, 2017. The court held that moves taken to withdraw the application would necessarily truncate the business of the court. Counsel to the defendants/applicants, Mr. Stanley Imhanruor had moved the motion for the discontinuance and while Olomu would not object to the motion he however asked for a  one million naira cost to augment the expenses incurred by the claimant/respondent’s legal team.
It was the decision to hands off the contempt aspect of the case that made Olomu to ask orally that further proceedings with two other applications filed by the defendants/applicants be halted in line with established legal position and rules of proceedings. However, Imhanruor disagreed, arguing that granting an oral application was not allowed in cases like that.
He also argued that since contempt proceedings are quasi criminal in nature, the presiding court should assume the position of functus officio and not make pronouncement on the matter.
In his ruling, the third of the day in the matter, Justice Oyinloye dismissed the position of Imhanruor, and cited several authorities to back up Olomu’s argument that once a contempt application has been filed in a proceeding, all other aspects of the proceeding must cease until the determination of the contempt application.
Saraki had initiated the contempt proceeding following the continued publication of what he argued were offensive articles against the court by the defendants/applicants, citing the provisions of Order 47, Kwara State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2005 which empowers the court to punish for contempt. He said the publications were on despite the earlier judgment of the court.
Speaking with newsmen after the session, Olomu said: “Since delivery of judgement on June 28, they have continued to libel our client contrary to the order of the court to stop making further libellous publication. They had abused the judge, everybody, court, desecrated entire judicial system, not only the judge but pollution of the judiciary. And we said in law, they must purge themselves of that before we proceed further.
“And that’s the position of the law. And that’s why the judge said that, since he had abused him, he can’t be the judge in his court; let contempt of proceedings be heard by another judge. It is also the principle of law that while the contempt proceedings is going on, all other proceedings must stop.”
Published by
Tags: Sahara Reporters Saraki

Recent Posts

  • Labour

NLC, TUC rift could weaken workers’ bargaining power, benefit FG —Ubani

Emenike Ikedichi Ubani, a lecturer in the Mass Communication Department of Abia State University, in…

November 3, 2026
  • Agriculture

The state of Nigerian agriculture and food security: Growth, challenges and outlook

By Lukman Adedeji Noibi, PhD. Executive Summary Nigerian agriculture stands at a paradox. The sector…

November 3, 2026
  • Business

Nigeria offers 40 oil, gas blocks to investors as bid portal opens November 20

Nigeria is offering 40 oil and gas blocks to investors in the 2026 Licensing Round…

November 3, 2026
  • Agriculture

Nigeria’s cocoa exports to U.S. hit $142m in 2025

Nigeria’s cocoa bean exports to the United States rose from $21.7 million in 2024 to…

November 3, 2026
  • Agriculture

Delta govt allocates 100 hectares to Olam Agri for animal feed production

Gov. Sheriff Oborevwori of Delta has presented a Certificate of Occupancy covering 99.99 hectares of…

November 3, 2026
  • Agriculture

5,000 Ekiti farmers receive tools to boost food production

In a renewed effort to promote modern agriculture, boost food production and encourage the participation…

November 3, 2026

This website uses cookies.