A former speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Adeyemi Ikuforiji has been re-arraigned before a Lagos Division of the Federal High Court for allegedly laundering N338.8 million.
Ikuforiji was charged alongside his former personal assistant, Oyebode Atoyebi.
The defendants were first arraigned on March 1, 2012, before Justice Okechukwu Okeke on a 20-count charge bordering on misappropriation and money laundering. They each pled not guilty to the charges and were granted bail.
The defendants were, however, subsequently re-arraigned before Justice Ibrahim Buba, following a re-assignment of the case.
On September 26, 2014, Mr Buba discharged Mr Ikuforiji and his aide of the charges, after upholding a no-case submission of the defendants.
Mr Buba had held that the EFCC failed to establish a prima-facie case against them.
Dissatisfied with the ruling, the EFCC through its counsel, Godwin Obla SAN, filed the Notice of Appeal dated September 30, 2014, challenging the decision of the trial court.
Mr Obla had argued that the trial court erred in law when it held that the counts were incompetent because they were filed under Section 1(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004 which was repealed by an Act of 2011.
EFCC further argued that the lower court erred in law when it held that the provisions of Section 1 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2004 and 2011, only applied to natural persons and corporate bodies other than the Government.
The commission had also submitted that the trial judge erred in law when he held and concluded that the testimonies of the prosecution witnesses supported the innocence of the respondents.
In its judgement, the Lagos Division of the Appeal Court, in November 2016, agreed with the prosecution and ordered a fresh trial of the defendants before another judge.
Following the decision of the Appeal Court, the defendants headed to the Supreme Court, seeking to overturn the ruling of the appellate court.
Again, in its verdict, the apex court also upheld the decision of the appellate court and ordered that the case be sent back to the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court for reassignment to another judge.
ALSO READ: Over 2,500 shows, exhibitions cancelled in 2020 over coronavirus
The trial is now to begin de novo (afresh) before a new judge, Justice Mohammed Liman.
On Wednesday, Ekele Iheanacho appeared for the prosecution while Dele Adesina (SAN) appeared for the defendants.
After the amended 54-count charges was read to the defendants, they both pleaded not guilty.
Mr Iheanacho, thereafter, asked the court for a trial date and prayed that the defendants be remanded in custody pending bail.
But Justice Liman held that since the charge was not new to the parties and since the defendants were already on bail, he would not make any remand order, but allow the defendants continue on existing bail.
The prosecution, however, argued that since the matter was commencing afresh, a fresh bail application ought to be moved.
The court, again, disagreed with the submission on the grounds that the charge was the same and the bail initially granted subsists.
Mr Liman then warned parties that the court would not tolerate unnecessary adjournments or repeated amendments to the charge during proceedings.
The court also directed parties to meet and confer on which document they do not intend to oppose, so as to ensure a smooth trial.
According to the charge, EFCC alleged that the defendants accepted cash payments above the threshold set by the Money Laundering Act, without going through a financial institution.
The commission accused the defendants of conspiring to commit an illegal act of accepting cash payments in the aggregate sum of N338.8 million from the House of Assembly without going through a financial institution.
Mr Ikuforiji was also accused of using his position to misappropriate funds belonging to the Assembly.
The EFCC said that the defendants committed the offences between April 2010 and July 2011.
The offences, according to the EFCC, contravene the provisions of Sections 15 (1d), 16(1d) and 18 of Money Laundering Act, 2004 and 2011.