Court slams 10 years jail term on rapist in Kogi
court sentences rapist to 10 years
A 23-year old man, Okwudili Ayogu, has been convicted of raping the daughter of his ‘master’ and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment by the High Court of Justice of Kogi State sitting in Lokoja the state capital.
The Chief Judge of the state and presiding judge of the High Court 1, Hon. Justice Nasiru Ajanah, on Monday, found the defendant guilty of the offence which was committed on the 28th October 2018 behind Mountain of Fire Church, Phase II, Lokoja, within the Kogi State Judicial Division.
The case with number HCL/04C/2019 was determined on the strength of its successful prosecution by the Director of Public Prosecution of the Ministry of Justice of Kogi State on a singular charge of rape under Section 283 of the Penal Code.
A summary of the offence showed that on the 28th October 2018 the victim took her bath in preparation to go to Church but when she came out of the bathroom, she was confronted by the Defendant who forcibly removed her cloth and raped her. She further told the court that after committing the act, the defendant started begging her and told her not to tell anybody.
Her father subsequently lodged a complaint at the police station the following day, Monday, and the defendant was arrested. She also told the court that even at the Police Station, the Defendant admitted committing the offence and continued to beg her.
During the course of hearing the matter, the prosecution called four witnesses, including the victim, who testified against the defendant. On her part, the court observed that the victim remained consistent and unshaken in her allegations that the defendant raped her during cross-examination even though the cross-examination was centred more on the challenge of her virginity.
Despite pleading not guilty, the defendant was convicted based on his initial confessional statement when arrested by the police and the evidence of the medical report tendered in the court.
“The offence alleged against the defendant is that of rape and I am inclined to agree with and adopt the issue for determination as couched by the learned Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions, Ms Iye Idama. The said issue simply put is whether the prosecution has proved her case beyond a reasonable doubt.
“Both confessional statements made by the defendant, in this case, were positive and unequivocal in admitting his guilt, the confessional statement of the defendant corroborates the evidence of the PW1 (victim) that the defendant raped her,” he said.
On whether or not the Defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim, the judge said he was “convinced by the testimony of the victim and the unequivocal admission of the defendant”, that he had sexual intercourse with her.
The three other prosecution witnesses who were called in the matter included a medical doctor who examined the victim and tendered a medical report. The doctor stated in his report that the “examination revealed varying degree of bruises on the Labia minora suggestive of assault. An assault of sexual assault (Rape) is being entertained.”
At the close of the Defendant’s case, both Counsel addressed the Court extensively on the issues for determination. Consequently, Justice Ajanah concluded that the prosecution has proved her case beyond reasonable doubt against the defendant and convicted him accordingly.
He said: “I have no hesitation in holding that the prosecution has proved her case beyond a reasonable doubt against the defendant. I therefore hereby convict the defendant of the offence of rape contrary to Section 283 of the Penal Code.”
While urging the Court to take cognisance of the time he has spent in detention in showing mercy, counsel to the defendant, Dr James Agboruhere, pleaded that he was a first offender who recently married and has a child.
However, Hon. Justice Ajanah weighed the offence “against the larger interest of the society against whom the said offence has been committed” stating that “the relationship between the defendant and the prosecutrix (victim) is such in which it is ordinarily expected that the defendant or convict would protect the PW1 (victim) in case of any danger.
However, the convict himself turned out to be the predator. It is against this background that I am inclined to and do hereby sentence the Convict to a term of ten years’ imprisonment (10 yrs) from the first date of his detention.” he judged.