Latest News

Court restrains House of Reps from conducting public hearing on law school hijab controversy

Published by

THE Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday ordered the House of Representatives to refrain from conducting the planned public hearing on the Hijab controversy generated by a Nigerian Law School graduate, Firdrusa Abdulsalam, the at the call to bar ceremony held in Abuja last year.

Justice Anwuli Chkere gave the order yesterday while delivering a ruling on an application filed by a coalition of law students seeking to stop the public hearing.

She ordered that the lawmakers halt the public hearing pending the determination of the substantive suit.

The court held that the plaintiffs, who are legal practitioners, had a right to bring the action since the decision of the House of Representatives would affect them.

Justice Chikere subsequently adjourned the matter till April 24, 2018, for the hearing of the substantive suit.

It will be recalled that Abdulsalam, a law graduate, was on December 13, 2017, not called to the Nigerian Bar on the grounds that she wore a Hijab to the call to bar ceremony.

The matter was taken to the House of Representatives and a public hearing was fixed in respect of the matter.

The lawyers, under the aegis, Coalition of Lawyers for the Preservation of Legal Practitioners’ Ethics then filed a suit asking the court to stop the House of Representatives from conducting the public hearing.

Their counsel, Mr Sunday Akanni, told the court that the lawyers had even undertaken that they would pay damages to the lawmakers in the event that their application was found to be frivolous.

He said they were seeking the interpretation of the court in regards to Sections 33 to 45 of the 1999 Constitution as well as Section 88.

“We brought the House of Representatives to court because of the public hearing.

“Our contention is very simple, the public hearing notice they sent is in respect of a lady called Abdulsalam Firdrusa who was not called to the bar on December 13, 2017, because she was wearing hijab.

“They say the public hearing is pursuant to Section 45 of the Constitution but we are saying it has to do with violation of rights and it is the court that can look into such matters.

“It is not for the House of Representatives to conduct a public hearing. Section 88 and 89 gives power to the house of representatives to conduct public hearing but Section 33 to 45 is what we call fundamental rights.

“If that right is breached where are you supposed to go, public hearing or court?”, he asked.

Published by
Tags: House-of-Reps

Recent Posts

  • Latest News

Police order 3 CPS to retire over statutory age limit

The Nigeria Police Force has directed a group of commissioners of police to proceed on…

November 7, 2026
  • World News

‘I can’t help you kill yourself’, AI teddy for 13-year-olds makes unprompted remark

An AI-powered teddy bear marketed for children as young as three has sparked fresh concerns…

November 7, 2026
  • Latest News

Power minister explains causes of electricity shortages

The Minister of Power, Joseph Tegbe, has attributed the recent electricity shortages affecting parts of…

November 7, 2026
  • Interview

Our town will pioneer community-based ICT development —Otunba Adedoyin

Otunba Adedoyin Adesina is the immediate past president, Ikenne Development Association. He speaks with Satuday…

November 7, 2026
  • Interview

Ikenne is unique, has produced 13 SANS —IDA President, Otunba Allen

•Says in 1975, Papa Awolowo rallied Ikenne sons, daughters to build first Town Hall As…

November 7, 2026
  • Interview

In 10 years’ time, Ikenne will be London of Nigeria—Kunle Soname, Chairman of ValueJet, Remo Stars Football Club

In this interview, the Chairman of ValueJet and Remo Stars Football Club, Adekunle Soname, who…

November 7, 2026

This website uses cookies.